INVITATION TO COOPERATION

Dear colleagues!

Our organization LLC “Logika +” invites scientists and employees of higher educational institutions for cooperation. The company operates in the field of scientific periodicals, publication of scientific articles, development of scientific journals, publication of monographs and textbooks. The organization also ensures the rapid and high-quality development of domestic scientific publications, the withdrawal of scientific periodicals to the international citation level. We cooperate with various scientific journals, provide services of various formats for the promotion of professional publications.

It is you who can become a member of the Editorial Board of our periodicals, which will help you to declare Yourself in the world scientific community, since our organization is an official member of the Spreking Member Crossref (DOI main registration agency). We provide services for assigning a prefix in the Crossref registry and registering DOIs for publishers, universities, research organizations, libraries and other organizations, organize and conduct international conferences.

We also need a scientist who can take the place of honor of the Chief Editor of one of our scientific journals.

Duties of the members of the editorial board:

  1. Participation in the decisions of the editorial board.

Peer review helps the editor-in-chief when deciding on the publication of a work, and because of the editor’s connection with the author, it can also help the author improve his work.

  1. Efficiency.

Each selected reviewer who feels incompetent to review the scientific research described in the manuscript, or knows that its rapid review is impossible, should notify the editor and exclude himself from the review process.

  1. Confidentiality.

Each manuscript received for review should be treated as a confidential document. It should not be shown or discussed with other persons, with the exception of persons authorized by the editor.

  1. Disclosure of information and conflict of interest.

Unpublished information disclosed in the submitted article should not be used in any reviewer’s own works without the written permission of the author. Confidential information or ideas obtained during the review should be kept secret and not used for personal gain. The reviewer should refuse to participate in the review if there is a conflict of interest arising from competition, cooperation or other relations with any of the authors, companies or institutions that are relevant to the article.

Responsibilities of the Editor-in-Chief:

  1. The decision to publish the article.

The chief editor is responsible for deciding which of the works submitted to the editorial office should be published. This decision should be made on the basis of verification of the reliability of the work and its importance for researchers and readers. The editor-in-chief can be guided by the methodological recommendations developed by the editorial board of the publication and such legal requirements as preventing libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. Also, when deciding to publish, the chief editor may consult with members of the editorial board or reviewers (or representatives of the scientific and pedagogical team).

  1. Justice.

The editor-in-chief evaluates the submitted works according to their intellectual content, despite the race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, ethnic origin, citizenship or political views of the author.

  1. Confidentiality.

The editor-in-chief and the staff of the editorial board should not disclose information about the submitted manuscripts to anyone other than the author, reviewers, potential reviewers, consultants of the editorial board, as well as the publisher.

  1. Disclosure of information and conflict of interest.

The information contained in the article should not be used in any of the works of the editor-in-chief and members of the editorial board without the written permission of the author. Confidential information or ideas obtained during the review should be kept secret and not used for personal gain. The editor-in-chief should refuse to participate in the review if there is a conflict of interest arising from competition, cooperation or other relations with any of the authors, companies or institutions that are relevant to the article. The editor-in-chief should require all authors of the publication to provide information on the corresponding competing interests and publish corrections if the conflict of interest was exposed after publication. If necessary, other appropriate action may be taken, such as the publication of a disclaimer or expression of concern.

  1. The study of ethical complaints.

The editor-in-chief should take reasonably prompt action upon receipt of ethical complaints regarding the submitted manuscript or published article, in contact with the editorial staff, publisher or academic staff

Send an author's profile

(you can choose one or several options)

(select one of the items)

Choose one of the items

You can attach an article along with personal data or send your scientific work by e-mail later info@professional-journals.com

If the article is not ready yet, you can send it later to the email address info@professional-journals.com